Understudy.net/org
Ok you have made it this far.You obviously must be bored and
have nothing better to do with your life.
|
|
Understudy.net/orgOk you have made it this far.You obviously must be bored and have nothing better to do with your life. |
|
My Archives: March 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Well I got my census report.
What did ask?
What race I was?
Well I am Caucasian. I realize that some bean counter up in DC may not know that but my race has never been an issue.How many people live in my house?
2. If you call my house and get my answering machine you can tell that also.How is person 2 related to person 1?
Well she is my wife according to the public records that has a copy of my marriage certificate.What is the race of person 2?
I did not see a box for exotic beauty so I checked off white.We don't have any kids so there was no person number 3.
And all my other wives live elsewhere.;)What they didn't ask.
My income.
Which can be found out by looking at my property tax records or many other ways. Broke is still broke.
Any disabilities.
Which could be found out if I had a handicap parking permit or many other ways.
What was my source of income.
Which can be found on my Linkedin Page, facebook, myspace, or by asking me.
How much my house cost.
Which is available at the tax appraiser's office. Which can be found online.
How many cars I own.
2 which you can find out from the DMV or by driving by my house.
How much I pay for insurance.
About the same as most 42 year old men who are married and have a wife who is 31. Who own a 5 year old corolla and a 21 year old F-150 with no accidents and no tickets.
If I receive food stamps.
I don't and that can be found out with checking the Dept of Ag.
How much I pay for utilities.
Which FP&L and AT&T have on file. I hope I pay less than others but I doubt it.If some census worker wants to come by and take GPS coordinates I just hope they will match to the ones that are used by Google Maps. I also hope they match the one's the Dept of Ag uses when I registered my bee hives.
So after all is said and done. Jerry Day and Michele Bachmann don't just look and sound like loons. They are insane.
Posted by understudy @ 05:15 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Careful folks Kyle is at it again. He thinks because he wrote a book he can reference it as a source.
The original story. http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/240325
Evolutionary scientists claim humans and dinosaurs could not possibly have co-existed.
That's right Kyle they make that claim because it's true.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/dinosaur-bone-age.htm
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7102-worlds-oldest-biped-skeleton-unearthed.htmlThe oldest biped skeleton is around 4 million years old. The dinosaur era ended 65 million years ago. Now this is the tough part for Kyle we will do some math.
65 million - 4 million = 61 million year difference. That is a big difference.
They insist that dinosaurs lived millions of years before humans arrived on the scene. Yet the available historical and physical evidence proves that dinosaurs and humans lived together only a few thousand years ago (see Lyons and Butt, 2008).
Ahhh look he is citing the book he wrote as a reference. Sorry Kyle you fail. Your book is crap.
One proof of this fact is the abundance of "dragon legends." These legends, from all over the world, describe creatures that match many of the dinosaurs and flying reptiles in the fossil record (pp. 13-45).
Wait, so I am suppose to believe that humans and dinosaurs exist at the same time because people believed in dragons? This is the difference with science it is not a matter of belief it is a matter of facts and evidence. You have no evidence and no facts.
The evolutionary attempts to explain away the similarities between dinosaurs and the creatures historically labeled as "dragons" fail completely. For example, in the Zhucheng, China area, over 50 metric tons of fossils have been collected, with thousands more fossils still in the ground (Cha, 2010).
And not one of them was a dragon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/25/AR2010012503035.html
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90873/6899106.html
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/02/thousands-of-dinosaur-footprints-reported-found-in-china/1Dinosaur fossils are so plentiful that paleontologist Xu Xing said they "can even be found in some farmers' private courtyard areas next to their houses" (2010). Local residents have been "digging up 'flying dragon' bones for use in medicinal concoctions for generations" (2010, emp. added). Residents have long associated the dinosaur fossils with the ancient creatures known as "flying dragons."
Please note he says he is finding Dinosaur fossils. That the term flying dragon is a quote for what some of the local residents may refer to them as. There has been not one shred of evidence to support the idea that any of these were dragons in any way shape or form.
It is no mere coincidence that descriptions of dinosaurs and flying reptiles match the ancient descriptions of dragons. As Daniel Cohen stated: "No creature that ever lived looked more like dragons than dinosaurs. Like the dragons, dinosaurs were huge reptiles.... It sounds as though the dragon legend could have begun with dinosaurs" (1975, pp. 104,106).
Daniel Cohen also wrote about the possibilities of Bigfoot, the Kracken, and other legends. He states that it "sounds as though" but he offers no proof.
The Bible clearly states that God created all creatures, both flying reptiles and dinosaurs, as well as humans, on days five and six of Creation. The repeated references to dinosaur fossils being connected to dragon legends adds historic evidence to the convincing case that dinosaurs and humans co-existed in the past and were not separated by millions of years.
The bible does not use the word dinosaur. Considering the term Dinosaur wasn't coined until 1842. Also looking through Genesis not once on the day four or five of the biblical creation time line does it say Dinosaurs or Dragons. So now you are misquoting and misinterpreting the bible.
Posted by understudy @ 05:33 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]
Monday, March 1, 2010
I am now the proud owner of a used copy of Biology Today (Second Edition) 1975
Creationist quote miners lose.Kyle Butts and other creationist have been using this book to try and disprove evolution. After I had email exchange with the author David Kirk I decided to try and find an actual copy. I found a used copy that cost about $2.00 plus a few dollars for S&H. It arrived in the mail today. I read through it to see the actual quote. It is amazing when you read what is discussed in the chapter how wrong the the creationist actually are. The lies are deplorable.
Attention creationist. I now have an actual copy of this book. The author is aware of your misdeeds. You lose.
Also while this book is 35 years old and may not hold the latest and greatest in scientific information it is a fascinating book. There is still so much of this book that can impart such wonderful information. I am glad to have a copy.
Posted by understudy @ 10:36 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]
