|
Understudy.net/orgOk you have made it this far.You obviously must be bored and have nothing better to do with your life. |
|
|
|
Understudy.net/orgOk you have made it this far.You obviously must be bored and have nothing better to do with your life. |
|
[Previous entry: "Biology Today 1975 Second Edition"] [Main Index] [Next entry: "The not so controversial census."]
03/06/2010 Archived Entry: "Kyle tries to refence his own crap as a reliable source."
Careful folks Kyle is at it again. He thinks because he wrote a book he can reference it as a source.
The original story. http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/240325
Evolutionary scientists claim humans and dinosaurs could not possibly have co-existed.
That's right Kyle they make that claim because it's true.
http://science.howstuffworks.com/dinosaur-bone-age.htm
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7102-worlds-oldest-biped-skeleton-unearthed.html
The oldest biped skeleton is around 4 million years old. The dinosaur era ended 65 million years ago. Now this is the tough part for Kyle we will do some math.
65 million - 4 million = 61 million year difference. That is a big difference.
They insist that dinosaurs lived millions of years before humans arrived on the scene. Yet the available historical and physical evidence proves that dinosaurs and humans lived together only a few thousand years ago (see Lyons and Butt, 2008).
Ahhh look he is citing the book he wrote as a reference. Sorry Kyle you fail. Your book is crap.
One proof of this fact is the abundance of "dragon legends." These legends, from all over the world, describe creatures that match many of the dinosaurs and flying reptiles in the fossil record (pp. 13-45).
Wait, so I am suppose to believe that humans and dinosaurs exist at the same time because people believed in dragons? This is the difference with science it is not a matter of belief it is a matter of facts and evidence. You have no evidence and no facts.
The evolutionary attempts to explain away the similarities between dinosaurs and the creatures historically labeled as "dragons" fail completely. For example, in the Zhucheng, China area, over 50 metric tons of fossils have been collected, with thousands more fossils still in the ground (Cha, 2010).
And not one of them was a dragon.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/25/AR2010012503035.html
http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90782/90873/6899106.html
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/02/thousands-of-dinosaur-footprints-reported-found-in-china/1
Dinosaur fossils are so plentiful that paleontologist Xu Xing said they "can even be found in some farmers' private courtyard areas next to their houses" (2010). Local residents have been "digging up 'flying dragon' bones for use in medicinal concoctions for generations" (2010, emp. added). Residents have long associated the dinosaur fossils with the ancient creatures known as "flying dragons."
Please note he says he is finding Dinosaur fossils. That the term flying dragon is a quote for what some of the local residents may refer to them as. There has been not one shred of evidence to support the idea that any of these were dragons in any way shape or form.
It is no mere coincidence that descriptions of dinosaurs and flying reptiles match the ancient descriptions of dragons. As Daniel Cohen stated: "No creature that ever lived looked more like dragons than dinosaurs. Like the dragons, dinosaurs were huge reptiles.... It sounds as though the dragon legend could have begun with dinosaurs" (1975, pp. 104,106).
Daniel Cohen also wrote about the possibilities of Bigfoot, the Kracken, and other legends. He states that it "sounds as though" but he offers no proof.
The Bible clearly states that God created all creatures, both flying reptiles and dinosaurs, as well as humans, on days five and six of Creation. The repeated references to dinosaur fossils being connected to dragon legends adds historic evidence to the convincing case that dinosaurs and humans co-existed in the past and were not separated by millions of years.
The bible does not use the word dinosaur. Considering the term Dinosaur wasn't coined until 1842. Also looking through Genesis not once on the day four or five of the biblical creation time line does it say Dinosaurs or Dragons. So now you are misquoting and misinterpreting the bible.
