eyeball2

Understudy.net/.org

Ok you have made it this far.
You obviously must be bored and
have nothing better to do with your
life.




I will be adding things here gradually that interest me. I don't really care if they interest you. This is not a page about ego. I don't feel so insignificant as to have to post all sorts of information about me. You want to find out about me, ask. Maybe I will tell you something about me. Most likely I will not.If you are a spammer you will suffer horribly for trying to link here. If you want to deface my webpage that is fine any script kiddie with two brain cells probably could but if have to sink so low as to do this page, you must be pretty pathetic. Get a life.





If you are someone who I asked to come to my website. I may have something here that interests you. Please go to the link I gave you or click on the item I mention. Thank you for allowing me to use you. I will still respect you in the morning.


News

Look Here





Naked Chick
Okay things that interest me
Henry Rollins
Rev. Billy C.Wirtz

Wednesday, June 13, 2012


More stupid shit on the internet

I can't go one day and here is another stupid item on the internet.

http://imgur.com/iqqCF

It's unconstitutional because of the presumption of innocence. When drug testing for welfare was done here in Florida. The results of those who tested positive was so small that it also did not justify the cost or the invasion of privacy. This generalized statement that there are A LOT of people taking advantage of the system is not backed up by reality. And when the government does it's crack down it ends more often then not hurting the weakest among us. It does not end up solving some non existent problem.

Posted by understudy @ 07:13 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]



Stupid shit on the internet

Once again the ignorant have come out. Lets take a look at this piece of drivel.
http://imgur.com/l5XWE

So you want Obama gone? Fine vote.

You want the borders closed? Fine, find people who will fill the void. The farmers in Georgia and other states are already upset because of strict new laws. You want to complain about how much food costs? To bad the immigrants aren't here.

You want English to be the language? Fine, are you going to penalize every deaf person in this country. Perhaps the tourists who come from other countries. So maybe putting safety signs for their benefit and yours is to insulting to your intelligence. Maybe having an ATM where they can withdraw money they will spend while they are here is to much for you.

You want a culture based on the constitution and the bill of rights? Ok so no more funding religious organizations. No religious organizations get to limit healthcare to their employees. No more trans vaginal ultrasounds for women who want abortions. As matter of fact you have to leave the abortion issue alone. Gays get to marry. Sorry but if you want a culture based on the bill of rights and the constitution, you might actually have to know what the constitution is about.

You want a balanced budget great. Because the government is a business and should be run like one and produce a profit? No? well damn then maybe you may want to adjust that blanket statement slightly. A balanced budget is nice and it would be good if the feds had one every now and then. Perhaps if we cut one of the biggest expenses, the defense department, we could come closer to achieving that goal.

You want tax reform too? Well hell let's get the corporations to pay their fair share and also let's get the rich to pay their fair share also and not try and do it on the backs of the poor and middle class.

Term limits? Well heck why not. Get them to pass.

Posted by understudy @ 06:58 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]


Friday, December 30, 2011


The Devil didn't make me do squat.

Another one of those ridiculous facebook posts that others see as deep and meaningful. And of course my witty insightful retort.

The facebook post.

"YOU PUT THE DEVIL OUT, BUT DID YOU LET HIM LEAVE HIS BAGS?" *Share: This is powerful*! You got out of a bad relationship because it was bad, but you are still resentful and angry (you let the devil leave his bags) You got out of financial debt, but you still can't control the desire to spend on frivolous things (you let the devil leave his bags) You got out of a bad habit or addiction, but you still long to try it just one more time (you let the devil leave his bags) You said, I forgive you, but you can't seem to forget and have peace with that person (you let the devil leave his bags) You told your unequally yoked mate that it was over, but you still continue to call (you let the devil leave his bags) You got out of that horribly oppressive job, but you are still trying to sabotage the company after you've left (you let the devil leave his bags) You cut off the affair with that married man/woman, but you still lust after him/her (you let the devil leave his bags) You broke off your relationship with that hurtful, abusive person, but you are suspicious and distrusting of every new person you meet (you let the devil leave his bags) You decided to let go of the past hurts from growing up in an unstable environment, yet you believe you are unworthy of love from others and you refuse to get attached to anyone (you let the devil leave his bags) When you put the devil out, please make sure he takes his bags!

[more]

Posted by understudy @ 08:31 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]


Monday, December 19, 2011


The Hapless Refuse of the Rocky Horror Picture Show

If you were a parent who was concerned about what your child would be exposed to if they attended a local theater showing the Rocky Horror Picture Show (RHPS), you had reason. Your child would be openly exposed to the possibly androgynous or homosexual, cross dressing, tattooed, waste of society. Then they would meet the second person. The RHPS was the collective cesspool of the misfits of society. If this is what you wanted to protect your children from you succeeded.


[more]

Posted by understudy @ 02:04 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]


Tuesday, November 29, 2011


More Bullshit About The Good Ol Days

So here is a facebook post that is just more bovine fecal matter.

In the checkout at the store, the cashier told an older woman that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment. The woman apologized to him and explained, "We didn't have the green thing back in my day." The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation didn't care enough to save our environment." Oh, so it's our fault? Well let's just think about that for a minute.

Oh yes, the gilded memories of the "good ol days." Never let facts get in the way.

Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Yes, we did that and then bottles were cleaned with detergents that were just dumped into the water and soil because there was no regulations on what toxins we could dump.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building.

No, but you had elevators unless you were around prior to 1900. You used them and didn't complain about it. Also escalators came around the same time so go back and complain to someone stupid enough to believe you without question.

We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks. But he was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.

Yes, and you didn't have Wal-Mart box stores 10 miles away. Box stores that basically shut down small business owners that use to exist within walking distance. You also had buses that belched out way more crap then today's 300 hp engine to due clean air regulations.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry the clothes. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that old lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Yes, and back then diaper services were what was on the market. the technology for disposables became really popular in the 1950's when P&G started marketing them as a way to save mom's from the drudgery of having to constantly wash cloth diapers. So yes, there was line drying depending on weather. Pants frozen stiff because of freezing weather or wet because you didn't get them off the line in time. Not to mention the towels that felt like 100 grit sandpaper if you didn't beat them to remove the stiffness. So yes clothes would be passed down from one generation and made with dyes that would stain your arms and legs when you wore them. Dyes that aren't allowed anymore because the long term health effects to your person and your environment have been shown to not be a beneficial item, unlike how you might choose to remember the good ol days.


Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana .

Yes, the pioneering days of radio and tv. We had so little and we were grateful and the younger generation doesn't appreciate us enough. Your B&W TV and old radio had tubes, you could replace them. You could also count on knowing someone would get killed because of the high voltage output transformers they came into contact with trying to change a tube. You had a few channels and if you didn't like it to bad, now you have 500 channels and nothing to watch. Yes but my 500 channel system doesn't use as much electricity as some of those old tv's and radios. So you caused the plants to burn more coal and fossil fuels thus contributing to the air pollution and soil damage. but you were grateful, right?

In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us.

Perhaps you grandparents did but don't ever doubt that when the blender and the electric stove came out that is what grandma wanted for her kitchen. Why? because doing everything by hand is hard ass work. If it wasn't there would have been no market or need for these devices which improved efficiency.


When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used a wadded up old newspaper to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap.

With the ink of the newspaper that would come off on your hands and darken everything you touched. Need I mention how wonderful that ink was to the environment and what the newspaper plants would do when done with it? Maybe you are smart enough to figure it out.

Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power.

Yes, and a much more environmentally friendly lawnmower you probably will not find. I hope you did not let your lawn go for more then five days because now mowing it was an all day process and even if you did mow it every five days it still took half the day.

We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.

Jack Lalane had gyms open in 1936. He was motivated by trying to help people get fit even back then. Guess what a lot of his equipment ran on electricity. Other parts of it were weight training and cardiovascular type activities. Which didn't require electricity but that was there to help people get healthy.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water.

We carried canteens and waterskins if you want to go that route also. We had to haul water miles in some cases. Yes you drank from a fountain with water that is supplied with water that is kept clean by the clean water act and other standards to keep you water free of the crap you dumped into it.


We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Compare the cost of a disposable pen with a refillable. The cost of a highly dangerous straight blade with a disposable safety razor. Most people don't shave with a straight blade anymore because the things are dangerous.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service.

Yes, and they belched more pollutants then would be considered any where near safe today. Kids still ride bikes today. And mom was a taxi service even back then. Denying that is wrong.

We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint. But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?

Yes, one outlet with two prongs and no grounding conductor. An item today which is known to be unsafe. We wired homes with knob and tube wiring that burned houses down because someone replaced the fuse with a penny. Also the satellites are not 2000 miles out in space but someone who went to school before man walked on the moon might not know that. They didn't continue to educate themselves and just accepted the status quo and the misguided memories of what their past was like.

Please repost this from just another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a CLUELESS young person.

So yes, please repost this and maybe an old dog can learn new tricks.

Posted by understudy @ 10:42 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]


Monday, September 13, 2010


The Stupid Is Strong In This One

So here I am in the Post Office at Summit Blvd. I am in line to get a couple of letters with photos mailed out. One of them is going to Bermuda, so I will need to present the letter to the postal agent. There is a slightly above middle aged woman in line in front of me. There are probably about 20 people in line in front of her. A woman and her son just finish with the postal clerk and are leaving as someone in line recognizes them. They exchange a few quick greetings and then move on. The difference here is they Gasp did their exchange of words in Spanish.

The woman in front of me says you know it's in the Florida Constitution that English is the official language. Now this woman doesn't know me from Adam. I look at her and I am not quite certain that it is true. I remember the English only initiative on the ballot years ago but I could not at that moment recalled if it passed. I also let her know as a businessman I only care that their money is green and if learning Spanish helps them pay me I have no problem with it. She seems put off. Waits about 30 seconds and then asks me if I have any kids. To which I tell her not yet, but we are working on it. She states when you have kids in school you will understand the importance of an English only situation. I look at her with a look of disgust and now let her know I have been insulted.

Ma'am I have done work with deaf people and the deaf community. They use sign language. They don't speak English. Should they just be written off? She looks aghast well and says I don't think it's the deaf culture. Also their language is based on a handicap. I point out it still isn't English. She admits she will have to ponder this point. I am wondering if she is capable of thinking that hard. Hearing parents who have children who are deaf don't have to use sign language. However it certainly is beneficial if they do.

I also mentioned I lived in Puerto Rico where English is not the primary language in many ways. Also that many of the other American territories don't use English as a primary language.

I again mention that as a businessman if I thought it would increase my profits I would learn some dialect of Chinese because they are a growing economy. Years back it was the Japaneses. She then got called but the postal clerk.

As I looked further into this matter, I wanted to make sure of a couple of things.

In 1988 Florida changed it's constitution to make English the official language of the state.

SECTION 9. English is the official language of Florida.--

(a) English is the official language of the State of Florida.

(b) The legislature shall have the power to enforce this section by appropriate legislation.

However the matters of how it is enforced are another matter and laws used to enforce I have not looked at yet.

My first language was German. Yes I born in California but I spent some of my young formative years in Germany. I don't remember any of it now. I learned some Spanish while I lived in Puerto Rico, I use it sporadically as my Spanish tends to be pretty bad. I took Latin when I was in High School. I also took Sign Language Courses at Palm Beach Junior College. Amy was the instructor. She still does interpretation for the Palm Beach County Commission.

I also note that most of the Europeans I know speak at least two languages. Most of them speak English better then I do. Also the best time to learn languages in my opinion is when you are young. So I can promise this. If I do have a child I would love to make sure the child is exposed to other languages. I would love it if my child spoke English, Spanish, Greek, Irish, or whatever.

If you are one of the people who spouts off that everyone should learn English if you want to live in the US then you know nothing about this country, it's history or many cultures. You are the ignorant fool that gets picked on for you low I.Q. and you deserve it. Don't revel in ignorance. Use your brain and learn new things. Learn where the English words you speak actually came from.

Posted by understudy @ 06:42 PM EST [Link] [1 Comment]


Wednesday, August 11, 2010


The Right Wing Is Still Filled With Haters.

So Robert W. Fortner wrote this article.

"Did Andrew Breitbart Lay A Trap For Sherrod's Fraud... Unbelievable!"

I found it on Brian Donavan's facebook page.

Here is a link to Brian Donavan's facebook note.

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=429114467808&id=769569671&ref=mf

Robert W. Fortner like so many is not interested in truth or facts. However this little diatribe of his wasn't originally his idea. Alas we must look at his article.

Andrew Breitbart is a media genius.

Wow! Well this is already on the downhill slope. Andrew Breitbart however may actually be a media genius. He plays fox news and the conservative blogs like a fiddle. They eat out of the palm of his hand and bite what he tells them hook line and sinker.

He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN ‘hooker’ scandal which he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to broadcast corruption in one of Obama’s most powerful political support groups. But Breitbart’s handing of that affair is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod ‘white farmer’ scandal.

The acorn scandal that showed how Gilles and O' Keefe had done selective editing in order to trash the organization. The same organization that was exonerated in court after the scandal. O' Keefe same person who was later convicted of trying to tamper with Senator Landrieu's phone lines. Basically O' Keefe successfully trashed an innocent organization into bankruptcy and you are still hanging on to the misinformation that this was a good thing. Don't let the truth get in the way. Breitbart released an edited tape that was meant to make Sherrod look bad when the whole tape showed the truth. Breitbart took a shot to his credibility and will probably take another if and when Shirley sues him.

It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror, Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his “Big Government” site which showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing to a roomful of NAACP members about how she’d discriminated against a destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she’d sent him instead to a white lawyer - ‘one of his own kind’ - for help. The black woman was Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately she became the center of a firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country. Within a day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded " and received " Sherrod’s resignation. Breitbart had won.

So Breitbart participated in the release of video that was edited to make Sherrod look bad instead of telling the truth. This is shameful on the part of Breitbart and you for accepting it in any way. Obama has already admitted that they were wrong in how they handled the Sherrod incident. To bad you can't admit the same thing. Breibart won? Because he cause Sherrod to be fired? So when Sherrod was offered her job back what do you call that?

But then seemingly Breitbart’s actions began to explode in his face. As Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech last March to the NAACP. And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of that entire tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart. Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he’d endangered their reputations by releasing a ‘doctored’ tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to the conservative media. I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in ‘doctoring’ a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.

Then why are you writing this article?

Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart’s release of that tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal government - a little known legal case called “Pigford v. Glickman”.

http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/07/27/pigford-v-glickman-86000-claims-from-39697-total-farmers/?singlepage=true

“In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997.” The case was entitled “Pigford v. Glickman” and in 1999, the black farmers won their case. The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle their claims.

Oh yes, the conspiracy bit begins. Here is the thing this lawsuit and the statement following it are correct. Now we need to see how we can turn things into half truths and link them together to make something salacious.

But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in relation to that original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to “Pigford”. The amount was a staggering $1.25 billion. This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers - had now swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America.

Okay not quite all the information but not an inaccurate statement. Let's start to fill in the gaps.

After the lawsuit was filed, Pigford requested blanket mediation to cover what was thought to be about 2,000 farmers who may have been discriminated against, but the U.S. Department of Justice opposed the mediation, saying that each case had to be investigated separately. As the case moved toward trial, the presiding judge certified as a class all black farmers who filed discrimination complaints against the USDA between 1983 and 1997.

Source: http://file.wikileaks.org/file/crs/RS20430.pdf
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigford_v._Glickman

What they then ended up with was over 23,000 claims most the claims were track A style which meant the farmers accepted a settlement payment of $50,000 of which only 15,638 were approved in the track A program. The track B which was for amounts over the $50,000 had fewer then 200 farmers. Beyond that there were 70,000 applications that were either filed late or not allowed to proceed.

So the total amount paid out on just track A was $1,006,404,262. So setting aside 1.25 billion was not a bad idea.

There are also still Track B claimants of which the largest so far was $13 million dollars.

There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America doesn’t have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally verified census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is only 39,697. Oops.

Now this part is basically correct. However just because you have a claim doesn't mean you get paid. However in an effort to be smart the money has been set aside for those that do have a legitimate claim. So the people who do rightly have a claim get their due compensation.

Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks, you’ll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the “Rural Development Leadership Network” but whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13 million) from that action - Shirley Sherrod. Oops again.

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/110/024/Is_There_More_to_Sherrods_Dismissal.html

Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United States - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of “Pigford v. Glickman” in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But in 2008, a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Obama.

Now let me state something clearly at this point. Your a bigot. You are also an idiot. Claims of race fraud as you wrote show your inability to think and your pensive terms show your bias. Facts however are far more truthful. The reason Shirley Sherrod was part of the case was because the farm group she and her husband worked with got screwed by the USDA. New Communities farms was one of the largest African American owned farms in the United States. So yes they went for a track B process in the case and won. They won because they had the evidence. Evidence that they were discriminated against back as far as 1981. Long before Obama was much of anything in politics.

From an arbitration hearing:
"Chief arbitrator Michael Lewis's opinion said that the example of the USDA's demand for New Communities' timber proceeds "smack[ed] of nothing more than a feudal baron demanding additional crops from his serfs.""

Do you get it now? They were wronged and they did what they had to in order to receive justice. They sued. Calling it a fraud shows how reprehensible you are. You should be ashamed.

Also giving Obama sole credit for the passing of H.R. 899; S. 515 does an injustice to what was also worked on by Grassley and Kennedy. You know Grassley the republican Senator from Iowa. A bill that was passed with bi partisan support.

Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.

Hardly, this bill was passed as part of the 2008 farm bill. And it was signed by President Bush.

Your calling it a race claim shows your reprehensible character. It was a case of discrimination and it was a blatant case by the USDA. Which is fine I guess as long as you are white.

As for Ms. Sherrod? Well, she’s discovered too late that her cry of ‘racism’ to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and her corruption. Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her ‘pigs’, it seems, have come home to roost. Oink!

And she was chosen by the USDA in 1999 to head up Office of Rural Development in Georgia. Maybe because the USDA needs to work on improving it's image and treating all people fairly.

Also a note to Brian Danovan. I feel you are as reprehensible as Mr. Fortner for posting this. You claim to be a christian. Must be nice to cover your cesspool of a soul with the pages of the bible.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACORN_2009_undercover_videos_controversy
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2006058,00.html?xid=rss-fullnation-yahoo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O%27Keefe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Communities
http://file.wikileaks.org/file/crs/RS20430.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigford_v._Glickman
http://www.aolnews.com/article/usda-to-pay-black-farmers-1-25-billion-in-discrimination-case/19369678
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/June2007/062107boyd.pdf
http://washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_HR_899.html
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.899:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Grassley
http://www.can-you-hear-us-now.com/2010/08/andrew-breitbart-is-media-genius.html

Posted by understudy @ 01:32 PM EST [Link] [No Comments]


Monday, August 9, 2010


Mindless dribble from tea baggers.

So I caught this article from a facebook friend. This is the crap the tea baggers buy into.

The original article is here.

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26137

Nothing like a little sensationalism to get one through the day. Let's look at this bunch of pablum.

"Americans have drawn a line in the sand to say the all out partisan political corruption across this nation stops here and now! Politicos got comfortable in believing their money and global contacts could propel them into powerful positions here whereby they could leap from there into fame, fortune, and notoriety “by any means necessary” whether citizens liked it or not."

Well maybe I misjudged. I would love the stop of partisan political corruption. Corporate execs getting tax shelters and high government positions, yes I would like that to stop also. However something tells me this is the bait to set the trap of luring me in under false pretenses. Let's wait for it.

"That philosophy also ushered in Barack Hussein Obama who is neither a novice nor a political innocent. He is nobody’s pawn. He is the leader of decades-long negative propaganda and deception via the Saul Alinsky methodology and his outrageous agenda, though well known, remains ongoing."

You mean the idea of stopping political corruption was what got Obama elected. Damn and here I thought it was other issues like the war, the economy, and a change from the previous 8 years of lies and deceit. Yes, hope and change it such a negative premise under which to run a campaign. You mentioned Saul Alinsky methodology and outrageous agenda. You mean like community organizing and grassroot efforts? Gosh I thought we wanted the citizens involved. You don't mean the same Saul Alinsky who wrote “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals,” because the tea party took it's methods directly from that book.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=7D78B2CE-18FE-70B2-A889E10B1C707BA6

"America will never regain her national standing in the world until and unless Americans stop being politically correct and start becoming straightforward about the dangers this nation is confronted with. "

Oh the fear mongering begins.

"There is a traitor in the White House Oval Office and he is surrounded by co-conspirators who are also actors in his destructive scenario. Let me be clear (as Barack Obama loves to say). There is a definite difference between the character and motives of any elected leader coming into such an honorable position with stated intent and actions towards destroying our national way of life and those who step forth to disclose it and resist it."

Ah, so Obama and his evil henchmen are out to destroy the American way of life. Yeah because in the almost 2 years in office so much has changed.


"The citizenry who have enough common sense to realize the dangers we face because of their actions dare to take on these traitors to stop them before they can complete their task. They are patriot heroes of today. Mark them well, because their day will come when American people will look back and properly thank them for their faith, honor, valor, trust, courage, and patriotism. One such deserving non politico hero is LTC Terry Lakin who is standing up to defend the constitutional oath he took upon enlisting in the military. Support him. Let him know he is not alone. Thank him for his stand. Pray his peace in the Lord God. Thank God for him. His victory is already assured!"

"[Disclaimer: My comments about LTC Lakin and the “Safeguard Our Constitution” site are not endorsed or advocated by them. But, I would be remiss if I allowed such a governmental atrocity to pass by unnoticed and without comment and recognition that “There but for the grace of God go (any of us).”]"

Oh yes, we will be saved by the crackpot brigade. Terry Larkin is going to throw away a great military career because of tabloid bovine fecal matter. The birther movement in all it's glory. His victory is not assured. His sad defeat is almost certainly assured. Let me know how all that praying goes after the trial.

"Americans can distinguish between people who desire to help us from those who are determined to hurt and even kill us. This present Obama administration continues to dig into the core of America’s fabric to pull loose every thread and leave her totally naked and vulnerable before this nation and the world. As well, Obama has further startled onlookers by labeling our friends as enemies and our enemies he has embraced as friends. No surprise there!"

Some interesting symbology there. Care to back it up with say, facts.

"Obama and many DEMS hijacked the political process by registering as Democrats when, in fact, they make up a combination of socialists, progressives, communists, Marxists, anarchists, and UN-American detractors. In particular, Obama registered, campaigned with, and was nominated by the Democratic Party. What’s more, although there are factions of the “Democratic Progressive Party” (DPP) scattered all throughout America, they are not legally recognized as a valid political party in America to enter campaigns which would gain them enough votes to be seated. Therefore, they deliberately schemed to hijack the Democratic Party. And led by Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) and others who believed the Democrats were too timid to put forth their agenda, in 1991, they formed the progressive caucus within the halls of the United States Congress and used that status as a means to lend false credibility to their cause and illegitimate platform."

Ah yes, the stereotyping so you can know your enemy even if you don't want to know a thing. These are the Rev. Dowell's terms for the people who make up the Democratic party. Nice to know someone missed the reality boat. The DPP is a political party in China. Please get a grip. It has no association with the Democratic party. Their platforms don't match. This is a baiting effort to induce fear and to hell with the truth. It's an effort to maintain the fear of the great evil commie who is out to get you. Grow up. You have zero facts for backing up the accusation of collusion between Rep, Sander and Rep. Waters with the DPP. We will state this, for Reverand you sure do lie a lot.

"The election laws mandate that Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates who campaign for federal office have to first be nominated by their political party, which route was used by Obama and others. And, since there is no legitimate “ Democratic Progressive Party” in America which can legally nominate anybody, how does Obama along with the others get away with foisting an illegal progressive platform on the American people and codify it by the legislative process? Obama is illegitimate in more ways than one, but this is more than likely one other way that will lead to his ouster in accordance with the United States Constitution and the rule of law. In fact, the DPP is actually a communist China entity and all other “progressive parties,” are beholden to that nation. Therefore, Obama-DEMS are determined to push America not only towards Middle Eastern Sharia Law and Islam, but also to sell us out to China and Communists."

This is such a lie that you have to really be an idiot to believe it.There are no facts in this statement.

"By the time exasperated citizens finally come across the truth and recirculate old news that has been tossed out like a bone to a dog, Barack and his “reform” have systematically and deliberately hacked into every area of our lives and have gone inside to sit on our chests to weigh us down. Meanwhile, Obama has already begun to circumvent our combined Congress by recruiting and moving people underground to undercut the Constitution, with his support. As I said from the outset, Obama had no intention of obeying the oath of office he took when he ran for office. Long before he was inaugurated on January 20, 2009, he had already recruited his loyal followers to carry out the most devious plan ever and he continues to draw more of them and their money in to help him!"

More rampant speculation. Deplorable at best.

"Barack Obama is no friend of America. He is illegally and unconstitutionally organizing and leading a lobbying force of monumental proportions from out of the White House in order to help him create his “citizen government,” to eventually bypass the legally constitutional legislative process. Moreover, they have been on a practice run. They have developed their own online voting booths that feed directly into the Wells of both the United States House and the United States Senate. And it is no secret he is very near to taking over all social networking sites on the internet to be able to censor and control all areas of communication and, thereby, chill free speech."

A government by the people, of the people, for the people. Yes, the president wants the citizens involved in their government. What an outlandish idea. If you want free speech on the internet you better learn what net neutrality is. Why it is important that the corporations don't control the lines of communication. That would require research and thinking. The author has not shown a capability for either.

"Obama’s Organizing for America (OFA) the offshoot of his “Obama For America” (OFA) has latched onto many national and international “partnerships.” They have aided in providing online access to all of the pending bills. And their purpose is to bring about “Direct Democracy.” The GOVIT site is better than the United States government website and more accessible. With permission from the Obama Administration, they have generated the software and sites that allow anybody anywhere to sign up and to vote at the same time as our elected representatives and senators in Washington, D.C. And, they know it is happening, too!"

The OFA is the same group always has been. The site allows people to view legislation and express their opinions on it. What an awful idea. Of course there would not be any right wing sites that do that would there? This false sensationalism is just showing how the facts would be awfully inconvenient.

"The GOVIT supporters believe that our elected leaders don’t know what the American people want; therefore, their purpose is to, in the near term, completely bypass Congress and create their own laws which will affect the entire nation. Anybody will be able to vote online even though Congress has not enacted any laws for them to do so, and the American people are unaware such activities (and more) are going on even as Obama feigns ignorance. Congress needs to step up and investigate that website, shut it down, and ensure the Executive Branch never institutes anything else like it"ever again! That Obama-generated ploy is misleading, subversive, unconstitutional and, regardless of the fact that Obama is their leader, those activities are illegal and dangerous to the general health and welfare of this nation."

You mean bypass like the Religious right tried to do with Prop 8 in California. How is the millions that was spent on that doing. The Govit site is supposed to help make government more transparent to it's citizens. You can view laws there and express a point of view on them. Doesn't matter what affiliations you have.

"Contrary to popular belief, the Smith Act of the 1940s is alive and well in the land. In fact, as of February 2010, it has been updated. Anybody who reads it will see how closely it mirrors the Obama Administration ideology, and that Obama is courting impeachment, a trial, heavy fines, and/or imprisonment for many years, as a criminal traitor."

How does the author manage to sleep at night when spewing such crap. The Smith act was of the 1940s and used against the "commie threat." It barely withstood muster many were acquitted and in 1957 most of the convictions were declared unconstitutional by the supreme court. The updated version you mention is the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2010 and that is still in committee.

http://mountainrunner.us/2010/07/5792_thornberrysmith.html

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-5729

"Now, I hope the reader understands that Barack Obama is blatantly and arrogantly setting up this nation for a fall and to deliver it into the hands of our enemies near and far by enacting laws which are unconstitutional, by enacting laws through the Executive Order process, by hauling in his self-appointed, unvetted and ungodly people and shoving them between those who were lawfully approved by Congress to serve and himself. And, by Obama vigorously building up his own coalition grassroots, parliamentarian government within our Republic, he has more than provided enough evidence to support his impeachment and criminal trial and punishment in accordance with the United States Constitution and the rule of law."

The tale of the collapse of government. This is grade school mellow drama. I would like to know what evidence for impeachment there is.

"Obama has done all he knows how to subvert the American political election process by his personal perpetual campaigning and his wholly partisan form of governance. His overall illegally undue influence can only result in a failed process and a failed nation. He must be stopped and Congress must step forward and act now to let him be the example to deter anybody anywhere who is harboring the self-same ideologies to take up where he will have left off. Unless steps are taken to stop Obama’s subversive actions, we are only pushing the problem down the road. And Obama is already up there with his criminal forces waiting to push back. Can anybody say, “Iran,” “Cuba,” “Venezuela,” and more?"

So basically with no real evidence and just a lot of fear you want congress to start investigating, find something he did wrong or better yet make it up and then impeach him. How about Congress gets with job of passing a budget, reducing the deficit, and dealing with the economy. I see zero correlation between what is going on with the Obama administration and the countries you mentioned.

"But for the corruption running rampantly throughout our legal system and government, Obama and all of his cohorts who apparently want American citizens to believe they are all exempt from having to obey the law would, themselves, have likely become the American example of a modern-day Nuremberg. And, the only reason they have remained in office for so long is because too many of our elected legislators are instigators and perpetrators. Moreover, they are timid and our judiciary is corrupt. But the loyalty of free citizens of the United States of America belongs to the United States Constitution and not to the man who takes - and forsakes - the oath “to protect, preserve, and defend” it. Opting instead, to set himself up as the dictator-arbiter of every area of our lives."

Still zero evidence.

"In the final analysis as pertains to American societal values, morals, mores, standards, norms, I believe citizens need to be more discriminating - not less. Americans continue to reject any of Obama’s attempts to “reform” America and to redefine new societal and cultural norms for us, our children, and grandchildren and expect us to like it. Too much damage has already taken place because of his narcissist self-loathing and self-loving (at the same time) and hatred of America. Untimely deaths and overall destruction all across this nation has been the unwelcome result. Americans are not deceived by any of them. Show it now and when you get out to pull that lever to cast your all-important vote on November 2, 2010! "

This has to be one of the worst pieces of dribble I have ever read. It is a mindless unconnected rant without a scant of factual backing. It is a hate filled piece of blather that has zero merit. If this is the kind of writing that the tea baggers like. I doubt they pose much of a concern as it reflects on a low standard of intellect. While the founding fathers were whiners when it came to dealing with the king. At least they went forth with a certain amount of rhetoric and reason.


Posted by understudy @ 08:19 AM EST [Link] [No Comments]


FreeBSD








Links to stuff on my site.
Mergemaster and Make World
Expanding my FreeBSD directory
Custom Prompts
DHCP Server and Gateway
My XF86Config file
The XF86 log file
FreeBSD mini glossary

Articles for GeekVenue
Expanding a partition - adding a hard drive
Keeping Time with FreeBSD
Setting up PPPoE
Changing your Shell
Customizing your Shell Prompt
Setting up a DHCP server and Gateway
Sendmail error and Solution
Mergemaster and Make World
KDE hostname error
Speed up Boot Time
Colorize your directories
Get ready for 5.x STABLE


Coming Soon Articles on Linux
As soon as I can get a break from work.
Tux




My Policy on Spam

[Archives]



Valid CSS!

Valid HTML 4.0!

Search entries:

Hosting By:
34SP.com - Budget prices, premium features

Powered By Greymatter

Uptime for prohost28.34sp.com

10:23:54 up 4 days, 22:45, 0 users, load average: 0.62, 0.71, 0.69
Beemaster's Backyard Beekeeping WebRing
Beemaster's Backyard Beekeeping WebRing
[ Join Now | Ring Hub | Random | << Prev | Next >> ]